After 4 days in DD, the shell-core peak time difference was still evident, although diminished in magnitude relative buy PF-02341066 to mice under LD20:4 (Figure S4). Finally, after 1 week in DD, the SCN network had returned to an organizational state like that observed under LD12:12 (Figure S4). Consistent with previous work (Evans et al., 2011), the spatiotemporal organization of LD12:12 slices was not markedly

altered by DD (Figure S4). These data indicate that the network reorganization induced by LD20:4 is not permanent and that SCN neurons are able to resynchronize in vivo through a process that is complete within 1 week. To test whether the reorganized SCN retains the ability to resynchronize in vitro, we tracked changes in network organization in LD20:4 and LD12:12 slices over time in culture (Figure 4). Whereas the spatiotemporal organization of the LD12:12 Bioactive Compound Library solubility dmso slices changed little over time in vitro, the LD20:4 slices displayed organizational changes and a decrease in the magnitude of peak time difference between shell and core regions (Figure 4A). To further examine this process, we used regional analyses to quantify changes in the shell-core peak time difference over the first four cycles in vitro (Figures 4B–4D). In contrast to the LD12:12 slices, the LD20:4 slices displayed large changes in the shell-core

phase relationship over time in vitro (Figure 4B, p < 0.005), and the magnitude of change correlated positively with the initial peak time difference between SCN shell and core regions (Figure 4C; R2 = 0.44, p < 0.001). When tracked on a cycle-by-cycle basis, during half of the LD20:4 slices appeared

to resynchronize with the SCN core shifting earlier (i.e., through phase advances; Figure 4D), whereas the other half appeared to resynchronize with the SCN core shifting later (i.e., through phase delays; Figure 4D). Directional differences in dynamic behavior over time in vitro depended on the magnitude of the initial peak time difference (post hoc t test, p < 0.05), with the SCN core phase advancing or phase delaying depending on whether the initial shell-core phase difference was larger or smaller than 6 hr, respectively. To further investigate the phase-dependent nature of these resetting responses, we used cell-based computational analyses to track individual SCN neurons over time in vitro (Figure 5). SCN neurons within LD12:12 slices showed stable phase relationships and similar period lengths over time in vitro, but SCN neurons within LD20:4 slices displayed larger differences in initial peak time and larger changes over time in vitro (Figure 5A). Using all SCN core cells extracted from all slices, we next constructed a response curve to investigate whether the resetting responses of SCN core neurons were systemically related to the initial phase relationship with SCN shell neurons.