g. evade a predator) with an associated reduction in another (e.g. reduction in foraging activity), in response to a trait component of another species (Bolnick & Preisser, 2005). TMIs are recognized as ubiquitous ecological phenomena, influencing not only how species interact but also how communities function (Schmitz et al., 2004; Preisser et al., 2005; Steffan & Sneider, 2010), originating top-down

or bottom-up trophic cascades, and also mediating competitive interactions (for a review of TMI see Werner & Peacor, 2003; Schmitz et al., 2004; Bolnick & Preisser, 2005). Our experiments demonstrate that the predation rate of tadpoles is strongly affected by TMI effects, since the tadpole behavior influences the predator’s prey preference and learning. In this context, we observed the following:

(1) Akt inhibitor TMI effects are highly context dependent because the subject affected is determined by the type of predator, by the antipredator mechanisms and by the competitors in the system (Werner & Peacor, 2003; Schmitz et al., 2004); (2) there are also prey-induced TMI effects in predator–prey systems because the predator’s prey preference is dependent on the prey’s antipredator mechanism. Context-dependent TMI effects are well known and have been demonstrated in various studies (Werner & Peacor, 2003; Schmitz et al., 2004; Bolnick & Preisser, 2005); however, prey-induced TMIs are less well known. Prey-induced TMIs differ from bottom-up effects because the TMI is not triggered by feeding/risk trade-offs of the prey, that is, a predator trait modifying a prey behavior (predator-induced TMI; Werner & Peacor, 2003). Instead, the prey-induced Aurora Kinase inhibitor TMI is triggered by prey preference/palatability or prey preference/prey encounter rate trade-offs of the predator, that is, a prey trait modifies a predator behavior (prey-induced TMI). Because of this prey-induced TMI effect, the shift in the prey preferences of the predators results in selective predation and reduction/exclusion of the system of a potential medchemexpress competitor species. Despite the fact that

the invertebrate or the fish predators used in our experiments can consume many types of prey species, they assume the role of specialist predators; the odonate larvae preying selectively on more active and, in general, unpalatable tadpoles and the fish preying on palatable and, in general, cryptic tadpoles. Moreover, prey-induced TMI differs from the common three-species shared-predator web TMI response (Werner & Peacor, 2003) because the causal path of the prey-induced TMI is from one type of prey (unpalatable or cryptic) to the behavior (prey preference) of the predator, which then affects the predation risk of the other prey. Thus, the prey-induced TMI can, in addition to offering protection against predators, reduce the competition with other tadpole species that are vulnerable to the predator in the system.