A significant decrease in the diameter of the liver sinusoids was observed with antihepsin treatment of the WT, but not the hepsin−/−, mice (Supporting Fig. 5A). Reexpression of WT, but not mutant, hepsin by hydrodynamic delivery of hepsin DNA to mice (Supporting Fig. 5B) resulted in a significant increase in the sinusoidal diameter in hepsin−/−, but not WT, mouse livers (Supporting Fig. 5C). These results indicate that hepsin is causally related to the width of

liver sinusoids, and the width of liver sinusoids can be regulated postnatally. see more We hypothesized that the narrower sinusoids observed in the hepsin−/− mice could result in increased hemodynamic retention of cells that flow through the liver. To examine this possibility, we treated mice with fluorescent microbeads as well as www.selleckchem.com/products/BKM-120.html tumor cells. Thirty to sixty minutes after the targeted injection of microbeads of different sizes through the spleen to the liver, nearly twice as many microbeads were retained in the hepsin−/−

liver sinusoids as in the WT liver sinusoids (Fig. 3A). These results support the finding that hepsin−/− sinusoids were narrower than WT sinusoids. Because the physical trapping of circulating cancer cells in the liver sinusoids because of size restriction is an important initial step in liver metastasis,17 we further examined whether hepsin can affect this process by challenging hepsin−/− mice IS with the syngeneic tumor cell line, B16F1. We detected a gradual accumulation of tumor cells in the liver, particularly near the periportal (zone 1) and sinusoidal (zone 2) areas and, eventually, in the pericentral space (zone 3). Overall, a greater number of tumor cells was consistently detected in the hepsin−/− liver sinusoids than in the WT liver sinusoids L-gulonolactone oxidase (Fig. 3B). In correlation with the preferential retention of metastatic tumor cells, there was a 7-fold increase in the number of tumor colonies in hepsin−/− mouse livers, in comparison to WT mouse livers, 12 days after the injection

(Fig. 3C). Survival curves associated with tumor-injected hepsin−/− mice were also greatly reduced, as compared to those of tumor-injected WT mice, because of severe tumor burdens (Supporting Fig. 6). A similar phenomenon was also observed when the experiment was repeated with Lewis lung carcinoma cells (Supporting Fig. 7). There was no significant difference in the number of apoptotic cells (Fig. 3B) in the retained tumor cells or the level of hepatic nitric oxide production induced by tumor cells in the WT and hepsin−/− mice (Supporting Fig. 8), nor were there differences in the host immune response or growth advantage in the liver microenvironment between WT and hepsin−/− mice (data not shown).