In addition to influencing MS risk, there is increasing evidence to suggest that vitamin D may modify clinical and radiographic activity of disease [183, 184]. A genetic component to MS susceptibility is

unequivocal. Genetic epidemiological studies have highlighted that first-degree relatives of individuals with MS have a 15–35 fold greater risk of developing selleck the disorder compared with the general population [185]. The greatest influence of genetic risk in MS is nestled in the class II region of the MHC, specifically on haplotypes bearing the HLA-DRB1*15 allele but there is a large influence of epistatic interactions. Several non-MHC loci with much smaller effect size than the MHC region have been identified in GWAS [186]. Variants of one such gene, CYP27B1 (known to encode the 1-α-hydroxylase selleck chemicals enzyme and therefore important for vitamin D metabolism) have been associated with MS susceptibility in Australian, Swedish and Canadian cohorts [187-189]. The discovery of VDREs in the classical promotor position of the main risk allele HLA-DRB1*15 [190] and VDR-binding sites associated with several non-MHC MS susceptibility genes identified by GWAS [191], highlight the intricate interplay between MS susceptibility genes and vitamin D (see Table 3). The premise that MS is

an inflammatory-mediated demyelinating disease has sculpted the view that the discovered susceptibility genes

primarily play a role in immunological processes. There is evidence, however, that inflammatory demyelination does not completely account for the extent of neurodegeneration observed in the disease [167]. Genes, such as those found in the MHC, are also expressed in neurones and glial cells in the CNS and may, therefore, subserve broader biological functions [192]. On review of the MS susceptibility genes with evidence of VDR binding, their role is far more complex than has been appreciated and likely extends beyond the traditional immunological point-of-view. In a subset of these genes, there are varying filipin degrees of experimental evidence to suggest an influence of these genes on the brain (beyond inflammation) in processes including (but not limited to) neuronal/oligodendrocyte precursor survival, proliferation and migration, neuronal cell cycle regulation, synaptic plasticity, and motor axon trajectory delineation (see Table 3 for cited examples) [8, 193-204]. It is clear that further study aimed at unravelling the effect of vitamin D on the expression of these genes, the impact of these genes on both immunological and brain function and how they influence MS susceptibility needs to take centre stage.