In view of these similarities, we compared the

range of transport mechanisms and substrates used by these two developmental organisms. Such knowledge, we reasoned, would allow us to determine if they introduce developmental complexity along similar lines at the molecular level. Our studies led to the general conclusion that these two organisms have solved their metabolic needs and created programs of differentiation by entirely different means. For example, while Sco has a plethora of sugar, organic anion, and amino acid uptake systems of very specific types, Mxa has relatively selleck chemicals few. In selleck screening library retrospect, this may be explained since myxobacteria are “micropredators,” lysing other microorganisms

which they use as food sources, while Streptomyces S3I-201 purchase species may have evolved as beneficial, growth-promoting symbionts of other organisms [126, 128, 129]. It seems likely that the programs of development exhibited by these two organisms evolved independently, and the similarities reflect the limited numbers of options available. Other physiological similarities noted above possibly reflect a convergent evolutionary process, resulting from similarities in the habitats in which these organisms live. Several surprises resulted from the analyses reported here. For example, Mxa has a member of the AAA family of nucleotide (ATP, ADP, NAD+, etc.) transporters, normally found

only in obligatory intracellular parasites. It also has more (9) CorC-type putative Mg2+ transporters than we have encountered in any other organism. Mxa additionally has a Ca2+-ATPase, although such an enzyme was lacking in Sco where a Ca:H+ antiporter, lacking in Mxa, could Celastrol be identified. It is known that both organisms rely on Ca2+ for developmental regulation [72–75]. We also discovered homologues of Spinster proteins, believed to be sphingosine-1-phosphate transporters in animals [53–55]. BLAST searches revealed that many bacteria have these proteins. Their substrates and functions may prove to be similar to those in animals since myxobacteria have been shown to have outer membrane sphingolipids [57]. Gram-negative bacteria have a number of transport systems that allow biogenesis, maintenance and function of the outer membranes of these organisms. These include the TolQ/R energizers of outer membrane receptor-mediated uptake of large molecules such as iron-siderophores and large vitamins, and they are known to function as energizers of gliding motility in Mxa [130]. They also include an outer membrane protein insertion porin apparatus (Bam or OmpIP systems; TC#1.B.33) and the outer membrane lipopolysaccharide export porin complex 3 (LPS-EP systems; TC#1.B.42). All of these systems were found in Mxa but could not be detected in Sco.