Furthermore, by virtue of the step-and-repeat mechanism, the NIL process can be extended for up to 8″ wafers. Figure 3 Photograph of nanoimprinted 4″ Si wafer (a) and SEM image showing long-range order of corresponding nanostructures (b). The wafer in (a), produced by SRNIL, was deliberately tilted at an angle to bring out the violet-blue tinge arising from the optical diffraction caused by the highly ordered nanoimprinted hexagonal studs of 300-nm periodicity. Metal-catalyzed electroless etching The mechanism of MCEE is well discussed in literature and will not be described at length here [28]. Briefly, in a solution of HF and an oxidative agent, e.g., H2O2, of appropriate concentrations, regions of Si that are in
contact with a noble metal, such as Au or Ag, are etched MX69 much faster than those regions without metal coverage. This phenomenon arises because the noble metal acts as a catalyst facilitating the local injection of holes into Si, resulting in its oxidation and subsequent removal by HF. The reaction is redox in nature and 4SC-202 clinical trial the metal ‘sinks’ into Si, creating an etched path. Therefore, by pre-patterning a noble metal layer on Si prior to immersion in HF/H2O2,
patterned etched structures can be generated. The steps leading up to MCEE for the stud-patterned wafers are described as follows and schematically shown in Figure 4. After the removal of the residual material at the recessed regions by RIE, a thin layer of Au (approximately 20-nm thick) acting as the catalyst was deposited by electron beam evaporation at a pressure of approximately 10-6 Torr. The wafer was then immersed in a solution of 4.6 M HF and 0.44 M H2O2 for the required period of time, after which the reaction was halted by rapid removal of the wafer from the chemical solution and subsequent immersion in deionized water. Next, the Au layer was removed in aqua regia at 70°C, and the NIL mask was stripped in boiling piranha solution to reveal the Si nanostructures. Figure 4 The generation of wafer scale, highly ordered
Si nanostructures from a SRNIL nanoimprinted Si wafer via MCEE. Results and discussion Figure 5a shows a 4″ Si wafer bearing 32 fields (each 10 Inositol monophosphatase 1 mm × 10 mm) of hexagonal Si nanopillars in a hexagonal arrangement generated by the aforementioned approach. The near-perfect ordering of the Si nanopillars can be deduced from the optically diffracted violet-blue light when the wafer was tilted at an angle against a diffused white light source. The near-perfect long-range ordering is also observed in the SEM image of Figure 5b. Figure 5c shows the closed-up SEM plan view of the hexagonal Si nanopillars. The period of the nanopillars is 300 nm (corresponding to an area density of 1.28 × 107 pillars/mm2) as defined by the nanoimprinting mould, while the lateral facet-to-facet dimensions is approximately 160 nm, a reduction from the approximately 180-nm pores in the NIL mould.