In both plasmids, a fragment containing the 5′ Rigosertib order ospA:mrfp1 sequence was swapped for a DNA fragment randomized at the Glu-Asp codons. After library expansion in E. coli and electroporation of B. burgdorferi, transformants were grown in liquid medium selecting for the library plasmids. To eliminate any non-expressers, we subjected the populations to a first round of FACS, collecting only cells with a clear red fluorescent signal (not shown). Gating was determined by plotting logs of forward scatter (FSC) versus

side scatter (SSC) as described [22] (Figure 2). After presorting, cells were allowed to recover in liquid medium and then subjected to proteolytic shaving using proteinase K. We surmised that treated cells would remain fluorescent only if they expressed a subsurface mutant of the OspA:mRFP1 fusion. Figure 2 FACS plots of OspA:mRFP1 mutant populations. Both pOSK4 (pRJS1009-based) and pOSK3 (pRJS1016-based) B. burgdorferi libraries were assayed. The two panels to the left indicate the gating

used. Forward scatter (FSC) is plotted against side scatter (SSC). The percentage of events, i.e. cells inside the gated learn more population (shaded rectangles) is indicated. The four panels to the right show the distribution of presorted, i.e. OspA:mRFP1-expressing fluorescent cells upon treatment with proteinase K. Mock treated cells were incubated in buffer only. Fluorescence measured via a Texas Red filter is plotted against number of events, i.e. cells. RGFP966 concentration The vertical line indicates the cut-off fluorescence for sorting. The percentage of events within the fluorescent population is indicated. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of pre- and post-sorting Anidulafungin (LY303366) cell populations Compared to mock-treated cells, the fluorescent population post-treatment decreased for both libraries, suggesting that proteolytic shaving indeed resulted in a reduction of surface-associated fluorescence. Interestingly, the reduction was more significant in the pRJS1009-based library (from 50% to 7%) than the pRJS1016-based

library (from 82% to 64%) (Figure 2). We initially attributed this to the potential of bleed-through of the original plasmid in the pRJS1016-derived library. Yet, further analysis showed that this effect was negligible as only three Glu-Asp clones were recovered post-sorting (see below and Figure 3). Figure 3 Composite phenotypes of lipoprotein mutants. (A) Expression, surface exposure and membrane fraction ratio values are plotted for each of the 43 identified mutants, including OspA20:mRFP1 (ED), as well as the OspA28:mRFP1 control are plotted. Data were derived from independent duplicate or triplicate Western immunoblot experiments. Representative data are shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6. Numerical data are listed in Additional File 1-Table S1. Y-axis ranges were 0-100% for expression/stability levels (yellow diamonds) and surface exposure (red triangles), and 0 to 1.0 for the OM/PC ratio (blue squares).