In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation

of insec

In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation

of insects and their habitats, 15th Symp. of R. Entomol. Soc. London. Academic Press, London, pp 155–211 Wikars L-O, Sahlin E, Ranius T (2005) A comparison of three methods to estimate species richness of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in logs and high stumps of Norway spruce. Can Entomol 137:304–324CrossRef Wisenfield J (1995) Experience at Hatfield Forest, Essex, with restoration of old pollards and establishment of new ones. Biol J Linn Soc 56(Suppl):181–183CrossRef”
“Erratum to: Biodivers Conserv (2011) DOI 10.1007/s10531-011-0147-4 In our paper “Predation by zooplankton on Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: biological control of the deadly amphibian chytrid fungus?”, we misidentified https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bindarit.html the species of Daphnia that Dactolisib solubility dmso consumes the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.

We reported the species to be Daphnia magna. However, it was pointed out by Joachim Mergeay that the Daphnia we used were probably of the D. pulicaria species complex, most likely the American lineage of D. pulex. Subsequent analysis of our Daphnia revealed that the specimens we used were indeed D. pulex. These were confirmed by Allison Evans of the Oregon State Cell Cycle inhibitor University Fisheries and Wildlife Department and W. Travis Godkin, an author on a major identification key of North American zooplankton (http://​cfb.​unh.​edu/​cfbkey/​html/​index.​html). We give below some references used and of value for identification of Daphnia species in case they will be helpful to others. We thank Joachim Mergeay for originally pointing out our misidentification. References Aliberti MA, Allan E, Allard S, Bauer DJ, Beagen W, Bradt SR, Carlson B, Carlson SC, Doan UM, Dufresne J, Godkin WT, Greene S, Haney JF, Kaplan A, Maroni E, Melillo S, Murby AL, Smith JL, Ortman B, Quist JE, Reed S, Rowin T, Schmuck Ceramide glucosyltransferase M, Stemberger RS (2003–2010) An image-based key to the zooplankton of the Northeast (USA), version 4.0. Center for Freshwater Biology, Department of Biological Sciences,

University of New Hampshire, Durham. http://​cfb.​unh.​edu/​cfbkey/​html/​index.​html Hebert PDN, Finston TL (2001) Macrogeographic patterns of breeding system diversity in the Daphnia pulex group from the United States and Mexico. Heredity 87:153–161PubMedCrossRef Pennak RW (1989) Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Thorp JH, Covich AP (2010) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego”
“The insects, and other speciose groups of invertebrates, pose particular challenges for understanding and conserving biodiversity. Not only do they constitute the vast proportion of all eukaryotes so far recognized, huge numbers of insect species (perhaps 85% or more) have yet to be formally named. This situation is only marginally better than that in the even more poorly known fungi.

Comments are closed.