It is symptomatic that this topology

was inferred by MP, the method known to be particularly prone to the LBA. To further test this distortion, one of the long-branched taxa was removed from the data set (matrix Sampling4). This approach restored the Arsenophonus monophyly and confirmed the effect of LBA phenomenon (see Additional file2). The aim of these taxonomically restricted analyses was to “”simulate”" phylogenetic placement of newly determined symbionts. In such casual studies, the symbiotic lineages are rarely represented by all available sequences in the way we composed the Basic matrix. Rather, each symbiotic lineage is represented by few randomly selected sequences. Under such circumstances, incorrect topologies (e.g. the Sampling5-derived topology on the Figure 4) AZD0156 can be obtained due to various methodological artifacts. This situation can be illustrated by empirical data: at least in two studies, the louse-associated lineage of Arsenophonus was not recognized as a member of the Arsenophonus clade [25, 34]. Consequently, when more recent studies, based on better sampling, proved the position

of Riesia within the Arsenophonus cluster [18, 24] the genus Arsenophonus became paraphyletic (see the section Conclusion for more details). Interestingly, topologies inferred by likelihood analyses using LY2835219 in vitro the T92 evolution model [31] were influenced neither by the compromised sampling nor by the removal of unreliably aligned regions. Cophylogeny vs. horizontal transfers: possible sources of phylogenetic incongruence The phylogenetic about tree of all Arsenophonus sequences exhibits both

patterns, the parallel evolution of symbionts and their hosts and the haphazard association of symbionts from different host taxa. Coincidentally, both arrangements can be demonstrated on the newly sequenced symbionts from various hippoboscoid species. Some of hippoboscoid-associated Arsenophonus show possible host specificity; in a few analyses they cluster within several monophyletic short-branched groups. Since relationships among the short-branched taxa are generally not well resolved, these lineages are scattered throughout the whole topology (Figure 2). In contrast, relationships within the long-branched clusters of hippoboscoid-associated taxa are in agreement with the host phylogeny (the Arsenophonus clusters strictly reflecting the host phylogeny are designated by solid circle in the Figure 2). Interestingly, a coevolutionary pattern was also identified for streblids of the genus Trichobius and their symbionts. In the click here original study published by Trowbridge et al. [20], the distribution of Trichobius symbionts was apparently not consistent with the host phylogeny.