On the other hand, an age-related decline in inhibitory processes

On the other hand, an age-related decline in inhibitory processes reflected by a decreased P2 component has been shown (Lister et al. 2011). Our findings argue against such an interpretation: YA showed a stronger P2 amplitude in the speech task versus the nonspeech task (i.e., in the task that requires less inhibition because no distractors have to be suppressed), whereas OA showed no modulation of the P2 component at all. Moreover, the topographic distributions of

both AEP amplitudes at Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical issue were comparable in both age groups. A shift into frontal regions, which is a typical indicator of inhibitory processes, was not observed in our study (see Fig. 3). Two alternative explanations may account for the lack of any task-related modulation of the P2 component in OA. First, it could mean that the results are in line with the findings in YA, suggesting that P2 does not represent see more neural inhibition. Second, one may assume that an age-related decrease in the inhibition processes in older participants is already Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical apparent in the AEP, but that this degeneration process is yet

not implied by behavioral output. To flesh out these possibilities, a longitudinal assessment is necessary. Are N1 and P2 two independent substeps of sensory Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical processing? YA and OA showed similar task accuracy, but demonstrated substantial differences in age-related neurophysiological response pattern. Because N1 and P2 seem to be originated from (according to the topographical maps) distinct neural generators and processing steps, it can be assumed that the occurrence of both the N1 and P2 component is not an essential requirement for accomplishing the task. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical In our view, two possible interpretations can

be provided. The lack of an additional P2 task-related modulation in OA represents either: An increased efficiency in processing speech stimuli. This, due to a longer exposure to language and speech that is also substantiated by an enhanced mental lexicon as measured with the behavioral MWT-B. Or The consequence of an unspecific Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical age-related neural degeneration process. In our opinion the latter argument seems more plausible because our stimulus material consisted of very frequent words. Its processing does not require a profound linguistic expertise. The most important finding, however, of this study pertains to Org 27569 an inconsistency between behavioral and neurophysiological data. In particular, while we observed age-related differences in the neurophysiological pattern we did not find corresponding effects in the behavioral task accuracy (i.e., discrimination between words and pseudowords, or between short and long white noise stimuli, respectively). Therefore, our findings indicate that the significantly different neural response patterns in younger and older participants were apparently not caused by an inability to understand or perform the tasks per se.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>