The position of strain C9-1 was peculiar in so far that it

The position of strain C9-1 was peculiar in so far that it clustered well outside theP. agglomeransgroup and showed almost no similarity even with otherPantoeaspp., sharing only a very limited number of fAFLP peaks with other strains of the genus (Figure4). These results were confirmed in three independent repetitions of the fAFLP analysis beginning with single colonies of each strain on different dates, and the identity of C9-1 DNA used in each fAFLP run was confirmed bygyrBsequencing. The fAFLP patterns were consistent with those from sequencing data (excepting C9-1), with a distinctP. agglomerans sensu strictocluster and

no separation of biocontrol and clinical strains within this group (Figure4). This supports the redesignation of C9-1 into check details a new species, closely related https://www.selleckchem.com/products/MGCD0103(Mocetinostat).html toP. agglomerans. Figure 4 Clustering of P. agglomerans sensu stricto

strains based on UPGMA analysis of concatenated fAFLP patterns obtained using four selective primer combinations. For each strain, a total of 885 data points (bands) indicating the presence (1) or absence (0) of an fAFLP peak were used in the analysis. P. ananatis, P. stewartii and P. dispersa strains were used as reference. Bootstrap values after 1000 replications are expressed as percentages.T: type strain; LMG: Culture Collection, Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Ghent, Belgium; CFBP: Anacetrapib Collection Française de Bactéries Phytopathogènes INRA, Angers, France; CIP: Collection de l’Institut Pasteur, Paris, France; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Manassas VA, U.S.A; ACW: Agroscope Changins-Wädenswil, Wädenswil, Switzerland (own

strains). Analyis of the fAFLP Poziotinib purchase profiles failed to identify any peak(s) unique to clinical strains that could be used as marker for pathogenicity potential. However, a 474-bp band was obtained using EcoRI-G and MseI-G (+1) primers that was found in all plant isolates (biocontrol strains) but none of the clinical strains (Figure5). The only exception was biocontrol strain C9-1 which lacked this ‘biosafety’ fAFLP band. Specific primers for the putative fAFLP ‘biosafety’ band were designed after cloning and sequencing the fragment. The band sequence consisted of a partial ORF identified as the encoding gene for a multidrug transport protein AcrF, which is part of a putative RND (resistance-nodulation-cell division type) efflux system. Primers for this gene amplified in both clinical and biocontrol strains, indicating that all strains carry this gene but that flanking regions may differ resulting in divergent fAFLP patterns. Figure 5 The fAFLP pattern generated with EcoRI-G and MseI-G primers from different biocontrol, environmental and clinical P. agglomerans isolates. (A) C9-1, (B) CIP 82.100, (C) P10c, (D) Eh325, (E) EM21cb, (F) EM22cb, (G) CIP A181. Biocontrol strainP.

Comments are closed.