We demonstrate

that extinction training with a single-pai

We demonstrate

that extinction training with a single-paired cue resulted in cue-specific attenuation of fear responses but responses learn more to other cures were unchanged. The cue-specific nature of the extinction persisted despite training sessions combined with D-cycloserine treatment reveals a significant weakness in extinction-based treatment. In contrast, the inhibition of the dorsal hippocampus (DH) but not the basolateral amygdala (BLA)-dependent memory reconsolidation process using either protein synthesis inhibitors or genetic disruption of cAMP-response-element-binding protein-mediated transcription comprehensively disrupted the learned connections between fear responses and all paired environmental cues. These findings emphasize the distinct role of the DH and the BLA in the reconsolidation process of fear memories and further indicate that the disruption of memory reconsolidation process

in the DH may result in generalization of fear inhibition. Neuropsychopharmacology (2011) 36, 1992-2008; doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.87; AR-13324 published online 18 May 2011″
“Purpose: We assessed risk stratification in patients with low grade prostate cancer managed by active surveillance using a 20-core saturation biopsy technique.

Materials and Methods: A total of 135 consecutive patients with low risk prostate cancer were prospectively entered in an active surveillance program in a 10-year period. The study entrance requirement and progression definition followed Epstein criteria using only pathological parameters, ie fewer than 3 positive cores, Gleason score 6 or less and 50% or less of any single core involved. All patients were monitored by restaging 20-core saturation biopsy every 12 to 18 months. A total of 120 patients with at least Flavopiridol ic50 1 rebiopsy

form the basis of this report.

Results: Of the cohort 30% progressed during a median of 2.4 years. Three multivariate analyses were performed. The first analysis used variables only at diagnosis biopsy and revealed that prostate specific antigen density greater than 0.08 ng/ml/cc and prostate cancer family history were significant predictors of progression. When combined in a 3-level risk factor score, they were significant (p = 0.003). The second multivariate analysis considered changes in characteristics between diagnosis biopsy and first rebiopsy. Prostate specific antigen velocity along with prostate specific antigen density and family history highly predicted progression according to a 4-level risk factor score (p < 0.0001). The third multivariate analysis validated the previously reported prostate specific antigen density cutoff of 0.08 ng/ml/cc at first rebiopsy as a significant predictor of subsequent progression (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.12, 8.93; p = 0.03).

Comments are closed.