We examined changes in mtDNA quality by calculating the ratio of region learn more 2 mtDNA copy number to region 1 mtDNA copy number. mtRNA gene expression was expressed as a log ratio of the concentration of either mitochondrial gene to the

concentration of the housekeeping gene 18S ribosomal RNA (18SrRNA). Primers used in quantitative PCR have previously been reported elsewhere [22], with the exception of 18SrRNA (forward ATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGGTG; reverse CGCTGAGCCAGTCAGTGTAG; GeneBank accession NR_003286). In the clinical substudy, baseline characteristics including age, gender, BMI, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stage, CD4 T-cell count, HIV RNA, and biochemical parameters were investigated as potential predictive factors associated with the development of LA or SHL in a univariate analysis (Cox model). Characteristics yielding a P-value <0.05 in

the univariate analysis were analysed in a multivariate Cox model. PD-0332991 datasheet In the molecular substudy, differences in mtDNA or mtRNA at baseline and time of event and changes in mtDNA or mtRNA from baseline to time of event were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Values reported are medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) unless otherwise stated. Between February 1999 and April 2002, 915 participants were randomized in 21 countries. Four participants subsequently found not to have been antiretroviral naïve at baseline were excluded from the analyses. Of 911 patients followed for a median of 192 weeks, Reverse transcriptase 14 [eight (57%) male] developed SHL and 10 [seven (70%) male] developed LA. The median

time to event was 49 weeks (IQR 39, 57 weeks), with the majority of cases occurring within 1 year of commencing therapy (Fig. 1). Incidence rates are summarized in Table 1. Two subjects with LA died during follow-up, and in both cases the CERC attributed the cause of death to LA. No subject with SHL died. Differences in baseline characteristics between cases and controls are outlined in Table 2. Cases were more likely to be female [nine (38%) vs. 182 (21%), respectively; P=0.05] and to have a BMI at baseline >25 kg/m2 [11 (48%) vs. 198 (25%), respectively; P=0.02; Fig. 1]. No other parameters (including routine clinical, haematological and biochemical parameters) were found to be predictive of development of LA/SHL. There was no difference between treatment arms in the development of LA/SHL. In multivariate analyses, only BMI at baseline >25kg/m2 remained an independent predictor of the development of LA and SHL (P=0.03). In a multivariate model including baseline BMI adjusted for ddI and d4T daily dose at initiation of treatments, BMI remained statistically significant (P=0.01). Neither ddI dose (P=0.31) nor d4T dose (P=0.87) was significantly associated with LA/SHL. Baseline characteristics of cases and controls in the molecular substudy are listed in Table 3.